tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5779786362928830721.post5243744624964275431..comments2023-11-16T05:28:03.237-05:00Comments on Agile UI: Using Blaze DS in Commercial ApplicationsRob McKeownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03931278610941549167noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5779786362928830721.post-42446232230191336802009-04-17T12:11:00.000-04:002009-04-17T12:11:00.000-04:00Thanks for the comment. That was basically my assu...Thanks for the comment. That was basically my assumption too, but when I saw the post I got a bit confused. Perhaps that is why the post has been taken down.Rob McKeownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03931278610941549167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5779786362928830721.post-64157303320964625632009-04-17T11:53:00.000-04:002009-04-17T11:53:00.000-04:00I'm not posting as a lawyer, but as someone who is...I'm not posting as a lawyer, but as someone who is very familiar through experience with open source licenses.<br /><br />There is no non-commercial clause in the LGPLv3, which is what Adobe has chosen to use as a license for BlazeDS. The terms of that license are what you must comply with - they cannot add additional clauses. If they wish to do that, they have to release it under a different license.<br /><br />Obviously this still may not be worth using, as with any legal issue the burden would be on you to defend yourself if they got a wild idea to come after you...and again, IANAL.<br /><br />I hate seeing licenses, especially open-source ones misused, so I thought I would at least comment.Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15229246615839778034noreply@blogger.com